Eritrea, The State of vs Venezuela, República Bolivariana de: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Eritrea, The State of
0
in 2019
Venezuela, República Bolivariana de
0
in 2019
Eritrea, The State of rank
180th
Venezuela, República Bolivariana de rank
180th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Eritrea, The State of
- Venezuela, República Bolivariana de
How they compare
Eritrea, The State of currently reports 0 against 0 in Venezuela, República Bolivariana de, a difference of 0.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Venezuela, República Bolivariana de has been ahead every year.
Eritrea, The State of ranks 180th and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de ranks 180th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), Eritrea, The State of or Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- Eritrea, The State of, at 0 against 0 in Venezuela, República Bolivariana de as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between Eritrea, The State of and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- 0, with Eritrea, The State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea, The State of and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea, The State of and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Eritrea, The State of ranks 180th and Venezuela, República Bolivariana de ranks 180th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.