Equatorial Guinea vs Nigeria: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1
Equatorial Guinea
17.61
in 2019
Nigeria
19.86
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
173rd
Nigeria rank
172nd
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 19.86 against 17.61 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 2.25.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd and Nigeria ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1, Equatorial Guinea or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 19.86 against 17.61 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Equatorial Guinea and Nigeria?
- 2.25, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nigeria?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Nigeria rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd and Nigeria ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.