Equatorial Guinea vs Mongolia: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1
Equatorial Guinea
17.61
in 2019
Mongolia
16.35
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
173rd
Mongolia rank
174th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Mongolia
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 17.61 against 16.35 in Mongolia, a difference of 1.26.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd and Mongolia ranks 174th of 188 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1, Equatorial Guinea or Mongolia?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 17.61 against 16.35 in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Equatorial Guinea and Mongolia?
- 1.26, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Mongolia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd and Mongolia ranks 174th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.