Congo vs Myanmar: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Congo
0
in 2019
Myanmar
11.53
in 2019
Congo rank
178th
Myanmar rank
176th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Congo
  • Myanmar
02.557.51012.5201420162019

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 11.53 against 0 in Congo, a difference of 11.53.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 178th and Myanmar ranks 176th of 188 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1, Congo or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 11.53 against 0 in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Congo and Myanmar?
11.53, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Myanmar?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Congo and Myanmar rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Congo ranks 178th and Myanmar ranks 176th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.