China vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- China
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
China currently reports 87.61 against 85.53 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 2.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
China ranks 57th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 59th of 190 countries.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), China or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- China, at 87.61 against 85.53 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between China and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 2.08, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- China ranks 57th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 59th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.