Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Central African Republic
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 17.61 against 11.7 in Central African Republic, a difference of 5.91.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 177th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th of 190 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), Central African Republic or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 17.61 against 11.7 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
- 5.91, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Central African Republic ranks 177th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.