Central African Republic vs Congo: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Central African Republic
11.7
in 2019
Congo
0
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
175th
Congo rank
178th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Congo
02.557.51012.5201420162019

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 11.7 against 0 in Congo, a difference of 11.7.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 175th and Congo ranks 178th of 188 groups.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1, Central African Republic or Congo?
Central African Republic, at 11.7 against 0 in Congo as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Central African Republic and Congo?
11.7, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Congo?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Central African Republic and Congo rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Central African Republic ranks 175th and Congo ranks 178th of 188 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.