Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Korea, Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Azerbaijan, Republic of
93.12
in 2019
Korea, Republic of
92.22
in 2019
Azerbaijan, Republic of rank
48th
Korea, Republic of rank
50th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Azerbaijan, Republic of
- Korea, Republic of
How they compare
Azerbaijan, Republic of currently reports 93.12 against 92.22 in Korea, Republic of, a difference of 0.9.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Korea, Republic of ahead.
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 48th and Korea, Republic of ranks 50th of 190 countries.
Korea, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), Azerbaijan, Republic of or Korea, Republic of?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of, at 93.12 against 92.22 in Korea, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Korea, Republic of?
- 0.9, with Azerbaijan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Korea, Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Korea, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 48th and Korea, Republic of ranks 50th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.