Antigua and Barbuda vs Marshall Islands: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Antigua and Barbuda
62.05
in 2019
Marshall Islands
62.89
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
126th
Marshall Islands rank
123rd
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 62.89 against 62.05 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.84.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 126th and Marshall Islands ranks 123rd of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), Antigua and Barbuda or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 62.89 against 62.05 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between Antigua and Barbuda and Marshall Islands?
- 0.84, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Marshall Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Marshall Islands rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 126th and Marshall Islands ranks 123rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.