Namibia vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number)
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) over time
- Namibia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 7 DB06-15 methodology against 7 DB06-15 methodology in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 8.2 DB06-15 methodology | 1.2 DB06-15 methodology | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 0 DB06-15 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number), Namibia or Sri Lanka?
- Namibia, at 7 DB06-15 methodology against 7 DB06-15 methodology in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) between Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 0 DB06-15 methodology, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Namibia and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number)?
- Namibia ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 78th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of documents to import records the number of documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies per import shipment. All documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies—including government ministries, customs authorities, port authorities and other control agencies—per import shipment are taken into account. For landlocked economies, documents required by authorities in the transit economy are also included. Since payment is by letter of credit, all documents required by banks for the issuance or securing of a letter of credit are also taken into account. Documents that are requested at the time of clearance but that are valid for a year or longer or do not require renewal per shipment (for example, an annual tax clearance certificate) are not included. Documents that are required by customs authorities purely for purposes of preferential treatment but are not required for any other purpose by any of the authorities in the process of trading are not included. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.