Cyprus vs Serbia: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number)
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) over time
- Cyprus
- Serbia
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 7 DB06-15 methodology against 7 DB06-15 methodology in Serbia, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 0 DB06-15 methodology | — |
| 2010s | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 7 DB06-15 methodology | 0 DB06-15 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number), Cyprus or Serbia?
- Cyprus, at 7 DB06-15 methodology against 7 DB06-15 methodology in Serbia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) between Cyprus and Serbia?
- 0 DB06-15 methodology, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
- How do Cyprus and Serbia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number)?
- Cyprus ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 78th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of documents to import records the number of documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies per import shipment. All documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies—including government ministries, customs authorities, port authorities and other control agencies—per import shipment are taken into account. For landlocked economies, documents required by authorities in the transit economy are also included. Since payment is by letter of credit, all documents required by banks for the issuance or securing of a letter of credit are also taken into account. Documents that are requested at the time of clearance but that are valid for a year or longer or do not require renewal per shipment (for example, an annual tax clearance certificate) are not included. Documents that are required by customs authorities purely for purposes of preferential treatment but are not required for any other purpose by any of the authorities in the process of trading are not included. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.