Chile vs Lithuania: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number)

Chile
5 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Lithuania
5 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Chile rank
134th
Lithuania rank
134th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) over time

  • Chile
  • Lithuania
012345200520092014

How they compare

Chile currently reports 5 DB06-15 methodology against 5 DB06-15 methodology in Lithuania, a difference of 0 DB06-15 methodology.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 134th and Lithuania ranks 134th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 5 DB06-15 methodology 5 DB06-15 methodology 0 DB06-15 methodology
2010s 5 DB06-15 methodology 5 DB06-15 methodology 0 DB06-15 methodology

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number), Chile or Lithuania?
Chile, at 5 DB06-15 methodology against 5 DB06-15 methodology in Lithuania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) between Chile and Lithuania?
0 DB06-15 methodology, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number)?
Chile ranks 134th and Lithuania ranks 134th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The number of documents to import records the number of documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies per import shipment. All documents required by law or common practice by relevant agencies—including government ministries, customs authorities, port authorities and other control agencies—per import shipment are taken into account. For landlocked economies, documents required by authorities in the transit economy are also included. Since payment is by letter of credit, all documents required by banks for the issuance or securing of a letter of credit are also taken into account. Documents that are requested at the time of clearance but that are valid for a year or longer or do not require renewal per shipment (for example, an annual tax clearance certificate) are not included. Documents that are required by customs authorities purely for purposes of preferential treatment but are not required for any other purpose by any of the authorities in the process of trading are not included. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.