Turkey vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Turkey
53.85
in 2014
Zimbabwe
53.85
in 2014
Turkey rank
105th
Zimbabwe rank
105th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Turkey
  • Zimbabwe
20304050200520092014

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 53.85 against 53.85 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Turkey ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Turkey averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkey Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 38.46 46.15 7.69 Zimbabwe
2010s 53.85 50.77 3.08 Turkey

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Turkey or Zimbabwe?
Turkey, at 53.85 against 53.85 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Turkey and Zimbabwe?
0, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkey and Zimbabwe?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Turkey and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Turkey ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.