Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Togo: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Saint Kitts and Nevis
61.54
in 2014
Togo
61.54
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
79th
Togo rank
79th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Togo
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 61.54 against 61.54 in Togo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 79th and Togo ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.54 | 56.92 | 4.62 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 61.54 | 61.54 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Togo?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 61.54 against 61.54 in Togo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 79th and Togo ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.