Puerto Rico vs Zambia: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Puerto Rico
53.85
in 2014
Zambia
53.85
in 2014
Puerto Rico rank
107th
Zambia rank
107th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Puerto Rico
- Zambia
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 53.85 against 53.85 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Puerto Rico ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 107th of 183 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.85 | 46.15 | 7.69 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 53.85 | 53.85 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Puerto Rico or Zambia?
- Puerto Rico, at 53.85 against 53.85 in Zambia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Puerto Rico and Zambia?
- 0, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Puerto Rico and Zambia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Puerto Rico ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 107th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.