Philippines vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Philippines
61.54
in 2014
Saint Kitts and Nevis
61.54
in 2014
Philippines rank
79th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
79th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Philippines
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 61.54 against 61.54 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 79th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.85 | 61.54 | 7.69 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 61.54 | 61.54 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Philippines or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Philippines, at 61.54 against 61.54 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Philippines and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Philippines and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Philippines ranks 79th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.