Paraguay vs الجمهورية العربية السورية: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Paraguay
46.15
in 2014
الجمهورية العربية السورية
46.15
in 2014
Paraguay rank
129th
الجمهورية العربية السورية rank
129th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Paraguay
- الجمهورية العربية السورية
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 46.15 against 46.15 in الجمهورية العربية السورية, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, الجمهورية العربية السورية has been ahead every year.
Paraguay ranks 129th and الجمهورية العربية السورية ranks 129th of 183 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | الجمهورية العربية السورية | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.15 | 46.15 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 46.15 | 46.15 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Paraguay or الجمهورية العربية السورية?
- Paraguay, at 46.15 against 46.15 in الجمهورية العربية السورية as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Paraguay and الجمهورية العربية السورية?
- 0, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and الجمهورية العربية السورية?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Paraguay and الجمهورية العربية السورية rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Paraguay ranks 129th and الجمهورية العربية السورية ranks 129th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.