Papua New Guinea vs Syrian Arab Republic: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Papua New Guinea
46.15
in 2014
Syrian Arab Republic
46.15
in 2014
Papua New Guinea rank
130th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
130th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 46.15 against 46.15 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 130th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 130th of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.15 | 46.15 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 46.15 | 46.15 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Papua New Guinea or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Papua New Guinea, at 46.15 against 46.15 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Papua New Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 130th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 130th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.