North Macedonia vs Zambia: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
North Macedonia
53.85
in 2014
Zambia
53.85
in 2014
North Macedonia rank
107th
Zambia rank
107th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- North Macedonia
- Zambia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 53.85 against 53.85 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zambia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 107th of 183 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.23 | 46.15 | 3.08 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 53.85 | 53.85 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), North Macedonia or Zambia?
- North Macedonia, at 53.85 against 53.85 in Zambia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between North Macedonia and Zambia?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do North Macedonia and Zambia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- North Macedonia ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 107th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.