North Macedonia, Republic of vs Vietnam: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
North Macedonia, Republic of
53.85
in 2014
Vietnam
53.85
in 2014
North Macedonia, Republic of rank
107th
Vietnam rank
107th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- North Macedonia, Republic of
- Vietnam
How they compare
North Macedonia, Republic of currently reports 53.85 against 53.85 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Vietnam has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 107th and Vietnam ranks 107th of 183 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia, Republic of | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.23 | 53.85 | 4.62 | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 53.85 | 53.85 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), North Macedonia, Republic of or Vietnam?
- North Macedonia, Republic of, at 53.85 against 53.85 in Vietnam as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between North Macedonia, Republic of and Vietnam?
- 0, with North Macedonia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia, Republic of and Vietnam?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do North Macedonia, Republic of and Vietnam rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 107th and Vietnam ranks 107th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.