North Macedonia vs Pakistan: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
North Macedonia
53.85
in 2014
Pakistan
53.85
in 2014
North Macedonia rank
107th
Pakistan rank
107th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- North Macedonia
- Pakistan
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 53.85 against 53.85 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 107th and Pakistan ranks 107th of 183 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.23 | 53.85 | 4.62 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 53.85 | 53.85 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), North Macedonia or Pakistan?
- North Macedonia, at 53.85 against 53.85 in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between North Macedonia and Pakistan?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Pakistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do North Macedonia and Pakistan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- North Macedonia ranks 107th and Pakistan ranks 107th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.