Nigeria vs Uzbekistan, Republic of: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Nigeria
15.38
in 2014
Uzbekistan, Republic of
15.38
in 2014
Nigeria rank
180th
Uzbekistan, Republic of rank
180th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Nigeria
- Uzbekistan, Republic of
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 15.38 against 15.38 in Uzbekistan, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uzbekistan, Republic of ahead.
Nigeria ranks 180th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 180th of 183 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Uzbekistan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.31 | 0 | 12.31 | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 15.38 | 6.15 | 9.23 | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Nigeria or Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- Nigeria, at 15.38 against 15.38 in Uzbekistan, Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Nigeria and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- 0, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Nigeria and Uzbekistan, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Nigeria ranks 180th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 180th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.