Netherlands vs United Kingdom: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Netherlands
84.62
in 2014
United Kingdom
84.62
in 2014
Netherlands rank
11th
United Kingdom rank
11th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Netherlands
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 84.62 against 84.62 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Netherlands ranks 11th and United Kingdom ranks 11th of 181 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.92 | 84.62 | 7.69 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 81.54 | 84.62 | 3.08 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Netherlands or United Kingdom?
- Netherlands, at 84.62 against 84.62 in United Kingdom as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Netherlands and United Kingdom?
- 0, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and United Kingdom?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Netherlands and United Kingdom rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Netherlands ranks 11th and United Kingdom ranks 11th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.