Netherlands vs Poland: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Netherlands
84.62
in 2014
Poland
84.62
in 2014
Netherlands rank
11th
Poland rank
11th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Netherlands
  • Poland
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 84.62 against 84.62 in Poland, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Netherlands ranks 11th and Poland ranks 11th of 181 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 76.92 84.62 7.69 Poland
2010s 81.54 84.62 3.08 Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Netherlands or Poland?
Netherlands, at 84.62 against 84.62 in Poland as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Netherlands and Poland?
0, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Poland?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Netherlands and Poland rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Netherlands ranks 11th and Poland ranks 11th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.