Montenegro vs Slovak Republic: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Montenegro
76.92
in 2014
Slovak Republic
76.92
in 2014
Montenegro rank
27th
Slovak Republic rank
27th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Montenegro
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 76.92 against 76.92 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Slovak Republic has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 27th and Slovak Republic ranks 27th of 183 countries.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.23 | 76.92 | 7.69 | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 76.92 | 76.92 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Montenegro or Slovak Republic?
- Montenegro, at 76.92 against 76.92 in Slovak Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Montenegro and Slovak Republic?
- 0, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Slovak Republic?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Montenegro and Slovak Republic rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Montenegro ranks 27th and Slovak Republic ranks 27th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.