Mongolia vs Tajikistan: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Mongolia
23.08
in 2014
Tajikistan
23.08
in 2014
Mongolia rank
170th
Tajikistan rank
170th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Mongolia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 23.08 against 23.08 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 170th and Tajikistan ranks 170th of 181 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.08 | 15.38 | 7.69 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 23.08 | 23.08 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Mongolia or Tajikistan?
- Mongolia, at 23.08 against 23.08 in Tajikistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Mongolia and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Tajikistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mongolia and Tajikistan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Mongolia ranks 170th and Tajikistan ranks 170th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.