Micronesia (country) vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Micronesia (country)
69.23
in 2014
Morocco
69.23
in 2014
Micronesia (country) rank
49th
Morocco rank
49th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Morocco
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 69.23 against 69.23 in Morocco, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 49th and Morocco ranks 49th of 181 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.23 | 64.62 | 4.62 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 69.23 | 69.23 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Micronesia (country) or Morocco?
- Micronesia (country), at 69.23 against 69.23 in Morocco as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Micronesia (country) and Morocco?
- 0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Morocco?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Morocco rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 49th and Morocco ranks 49th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.