Mauritius vs United States: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Mauritius
76.92
in 2014
United States
76.92
in 2014
Mauritius rank
27th
United States rank
27th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Mauritius
- United States
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 76.92 against 76.92 in United States, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 27th and United States ranks 27th of 181 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.85 | 76.92 | 3.08 | United States |
| 2010s | 76.92 | 76.92 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Mauritius or United States?
- Mauritius, at 76.92 against 76.92 in United States as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Mauritius and United States?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United States?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and United States rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Mauritius ranks 27th and United States ranks 27th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.