Marshall Islands vs Mauritius: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Marshall Islands
76.92
in 2014
Mauritius
76.92
in 2014
Marshall Islands rank
27th
Mauritius rank
27th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Marshall Islands
- Mauritius
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 76.92 against 76.92 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 27th and Mauritius ranks 27th of 181 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.92 | 73.85 | 3.08 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 76.92 | 76.92 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Marshall Islands or Mauritius?
- Marshall Islands, at 76.92 against 76.92 in Mauritius as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Marshall Islands and Mauritius?
- 0, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Mauritius?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Marshall Islands and Mauritius rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Marshall Islands ranks 27th and Mauritius ranks 27th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.