Mali vs Moldova: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Mali
30.77
in 2014
Moldova
30.77
in 2014
Mali rank
159th
Moldova rank
159th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Mali
  • Moldova
0102030200520092014

How they compare

Mali currently reports 30.77 against 30.77 in Moldova, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 159th and Moldova ranks 159th of 181 countries.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 24.62 30.77 6.15 Moldova
2010s 30.77 30.77 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Mali or Moldova?
Mali, at 30.77 against 30.77 in Moldova as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Mali and Moldova?
0, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Moldova?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Mali and Moldova rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Mali ranks 159th and Moldova ranks 159th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.