Madagascar vs Mozambique: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Madagascar
46.15
in 2014
Mozambique
46.15
in 2014
Madagascar rank
127th
Mozambique rank
127th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Madagascar
- Mozambique
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 46.15 against 46.15 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 127th and Mozambique ranks 127th of 181 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.46 | 46.15 | 7.69 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 46.15 | 46.15 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Madagascar or Mozambique?
- Madagascar, at 46.15 against 46.15 in Mozambique as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Madagascar and Mozambique?
- 0, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Mozambique?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Madagascar and Mozambique rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Madagascar ranks 127th and Mozambique ranks 127th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.