Luxembourg vs Netherlands: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Luxembourg
84.62
in 2014
Netherlands
84.62
in 2014
Luxembourg rank
11th
Netherlands rank
11th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Luxembourg
- Netherlands
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 84.62 against 84.62 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 11th and Netherlands ranks 11th of 181 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.62 | 76.92 | 7.69 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 84.62 | 81.54 | 3.08 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Luxembourg or Netherlands?
- Luxembourg, at 84.62 against 84.62 in Netherlands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Luxembourg and Netherlands?
- 0, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Netherlands?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Luxembourg and Netherlands rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Luxembourg ranks 11th and Netherlands ranks 11th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.