Lithuania vs Mauritius: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Lithuania
76.92
in 2014
Mauritius
76.92
in 2014
Lithuania rank
27th
Mauritius rank
27th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Lithuania
- Mauritius
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 76.92 against 76.92 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 27th and Mauritius ranks 27th of 181 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.92 | 73.85 | 3.08 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 76.92 | 76.92 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Lithuania or Mauritius?
- Lithuania, at 76.92 against 76.92 in Mauritius as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Lithuania and Mauritius?
- 0, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mauritius?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Lithuania and Mauritius rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Lithuania ranks 27th and Mauritius ranks 27th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.