Latvia, Republic of vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Latvia, Republic of
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Latvia, Republic of currently reports 76.92 against 76.92 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia, Republic of ahead.
Latvia, Republic of ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia, Republic of | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.31 | 64.62 | 7.69 | Latvia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 72.31 | 76.92 | 4.62 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Latvia, Republic of or United Arab Emirates?
- Latvia, Republic of, at 76.92 against 76.92 in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Latvia, Republic of and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Latvia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia, Republic of and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Latvia, Republic of and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Latvia, Republic of ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.