South Korea vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
South Korea
92.31
in 2014
Singapore
92.31
in 2014
South Korea rank
3rd
Singapore rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- South Korea
- Singapore
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 92.31 against 92.31 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.69 | 92.31 | 24.62 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 92.31 | 92.31 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, South Korea or Singapore?
- South Korea, at 92.31 against 92.31 in Singapore as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between South Korea and Singapore?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- South Korea ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.