Kenya vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Kenya
46.15
in 2014
Papua New Guinea
46.15
in 2014
Kenya rank
129th
Papua New Guinea rank
129th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Kenya
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 46.15 against 46.15 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 129th and Papua New Guinea ranks 129th of 183 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.46 | 46.15 | 7.69 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 46.15 | 46.15 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Kenya or Papua New Guinea?
- Kenya, at 46.15 against 46.15 in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Kenya and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Papua New Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kenya and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Kenya ranks 129th and Papua New Guinea ranks 129th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.