Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Kyrgyzstan: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Iran (Islamic Republic of)
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Iran (Islamic Republic of) currently reports 30.77 against 30.77 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 161st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 161st of 183 countries.
Iran (Islamic Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran (Islamic Republic of) | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.77 | 6.15 | 24.62 | Iran (Islamic Republic of) |
| 2010s | 30.77 | 30.77 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Kyrgyzstan?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of), at 30.77 against 30.77 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 161st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 161st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.