Guinea-Bissau vs Micronesia (country): Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Guinea-Bissau
69.23
in 2014
Micronesia (country)
69.23
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau rank
49th
Micronesia (country) rank
49th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 69.23 against 69.23 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 49th and Micronesia (country) ranks 49th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.23 | 69.23 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 69.23 | 69.23 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Guinea-Bissau or Micronesia (country)?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 69.23 against 69.23 in Micronesia (country) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Guinea-Bissau and Micronesia (country)?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Micronesia (country)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Micronesia (country) rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 49th and Micronesia (country) ranks 49th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.