Gambia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Gambia
69.23
in 2014
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
69.23
in 2014
Gambia rank
50th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
50th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Gambia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 69.23 against 69.23 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 50th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 50th of 184 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.23 | 69.23 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 69.23 | 69.23 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Gambia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Gambia, at 69.23 against 69.23 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Gambia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Gambia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Gambia ranks 50th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 50th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.