France vs Italy: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

France
100
in 2014
Italy
92.31
in 2014
France rank
1st
Italy rank
3rd

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • France
  • Italy
20406080100200520092014

How they compare

France currently reports 100 against 92.31 in Italy, a difference of 7.69.

That makes France's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Italy ahead.

France ranks 1st and Italy ranks 3rd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Italy Difference Ahead
2000s 73.85 92.31 18.46 Italy
2010s 100 92.31 7.69 France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, France or Italy?
France, at 100 against 92.31 in Italy as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between France and Italy?
7.69, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Italy?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do France and Italy rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
France ranks 1st and Italy ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.