Ethiopia vs Kyrgyzstan: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Ethiopia
30.77
in 2014
Kyrgyzstan
30.77
in 2014
Ethiopia rank
161st
Kyrgyzstan rank
161st
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Ethiopia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 30.77 against 30.77 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 161st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 161st of 183 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.77 | 6.15 | 24.62 | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 30.77 | 30.77 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Ethiopia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ethiopia, at 30.77 against 30.77 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Ethiopia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Ethiopia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Ethiopia ranks 161st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 161st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.