Eswatini vs Grenada: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Eswatini
69.23
in 2014
Grenada
69.23
in 2014
Eswatini rank
49th
Grenada rank
49th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Eswatini
- Grenada
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 69.23 against 69.23 in Grenada, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 49th and Grenada ranks 49th of 181 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.54 | 69.23 | 7.69 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 66.15 | 69.23 | 3.08 | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Eswatini or Grenada?
- Eswatini, at 69.23 against 69.23 in Grenada as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Eswatini and Grenada?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Grenada?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Grenada rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Eswatini ranks 49th and Grenada ranks 49th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.