Eritrea vs Mongolia: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Eritrea
23.08
in 2014
Mongolia
23.08
in 2014
Eritrea rank
170th
Mongolia rank
170th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Eritrea
  • Mongolia
0510152025200520092014

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 23.08 against 23.08 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 170th and Mongolia ranks 170th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 23.08 23.08 0
2010s 23.08 23.08 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Eritrea or Mongolia?
Eritrea, at 23.08 against 23.08 in Mongolia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Eritrea and Mongolia?
0, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Mongolia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Eritrea and Mongolia rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Eritrea ranks 170th and Mongolia ranks 170th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.