Equatorial Guinea vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Equatorial Guinea
69.23
in 2014
Morocco
69.23
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
49th
Morocco rank
49th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Morocco
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 69.23 against 69.23 in Morocco, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Morocco ranks 49th of 181 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.23 | 64.62 | 4.62 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 69.23 | 69.23 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Equatorial Guinea or Morocco?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 69.23 against 69.23 in Morocco as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Equatorial Guinea and Morocco?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Morocco?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Morocco rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Morocco ranks 49th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.