Equatorial Guinea vs Kiribati: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Equatorial Guinea
69.23
in 2014
Kiribati
69.23
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
49th
Kiribati rank
49th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Kiribati
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 69.23 against 69.23 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Kiribati ranks 49th of 181 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.23 | 69.23 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 69.23 | 69.23 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Equatorial Guinea or Kiribati?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 69.23 against 69.23 in Kiribati as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Equatorial Guinea and Kiribati?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kiribati?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Kiribati rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 49th and Kiribati ranks 49th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.