El Salvador vs Qatar: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
El Salvador
61.54
in 2014
Qatar
61.54
in 2014
El Salvador rank
79th
Qatar rank
79th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- El Salvador
- Qatar
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 61.54 against 61.54 in Qatar, a difference of 0.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 79th and Qatar ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.41 | 61.54 | 5.13 | Qatar |
| 2010s | 61.54 | 61.54 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, El Salvador or Qatar?
- El Salvador, at 61.54 against 61.54 in Qatar as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between El Salvador and Qatar?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Qatar?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do El Salvador and Qatar rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- El Salvador ranks 79th and Qatar ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.