El Salvador vs Jordan: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
El Salvador
61.54
in 2014
Jordan
61.54
in 2014
El Salvador rank
79th
Jordan rank
79th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- El Salvador
- Jordan
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 61.54 against 61.54 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 79th and Jordan ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.31 | 53.85 | 1.54 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 61.54 | 61.54 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), El Salvador or Jordan?
- El Salvador, at 61.54 against 61.54 in Jordan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between El Salvador and Jordan?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Jordan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do El Salvador and Jordan rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- El Salvador ranks 79th and Jordan ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.