Dominican Republic vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Dominican Republic
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 76.92 against 76.92 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 183 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 64.62 | 4.62 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 70.77 | 76.92 | 6.15 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Dominican Republic or United Arab Emirates?
- Dominican Republic, at 76.92 against 76.92 in United Arab Emirates as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Dominican Republic and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and United Arab Emirates?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.