Dominican Republic vs Thailand: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Dominican Republic
76.92
in 2014
Thailand
76.92
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
27th
Thailand rank
27th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Thailand
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 76.92 against 76.92 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Thailand ranks 27th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 49.23 | 10.77 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 70.77 | 76.92 | 6.15 | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Dominican Republic or Thailand?
- Dominican Republic, at 76.92 against 76.92 in Thailand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Dominican Republic and Thailand?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Thailand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Thailand rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Thailand ranks 27th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.