Dominican Republic vs Lithuania: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol
Dominican Republic
76.92
in 2014
Lithuania
76.92
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
27th
Lithuania rank
27th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time
- Dominican Republic
- Lithuania
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 76.92 against 76.92 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 27th of 181 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 76.92 | 16.92 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 70.77 | 76.92 | 6.15 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Dominican Republic or Lithuania?
- Dominican Republic, at 76.92 against 76.92 in Lithuania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Dominican Republic and Lithuania?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Lithuania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Lithuania rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Dominican Republic ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 27th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.